fbs k562 atcc imdm Search Results


99
ATCC culture with imdm
Culture With Imdm, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/culture with imdm/product/ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
culture with imdm - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

96
DSMZ fbs 26 cml k 562 sibs ham s f12k
Fbs 26 Cml K 562 Sibs Ham S F12k, supplied by DSMZ, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 96/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/fbs 26 cml k 562 sibs ham s f12k/product/DSMZ
Average 96 stars, based on 1 article reviews
fbs 26 cml k 562 sibs ham s f12k - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
96/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

99
ATCC human k562 cells
Figure 2. Development of a lentiviral ADAR1 A-to-I RNA editing reporter (A) Schematic diagram demonstrating the synthetic RNA sequence containing an ADAR1-sensitive stop codon that, upon A-to-I editing, reads through to produce nanoluciferase and GFP proteins separated by a T2A cleavage site. (B) ADAR protein expression levels in 293T cells co-transfected with the ADAR1 nanoluciferase-GFP (nanoluc-GFP) reporter and increasing amounts of FLAG- tagged wild-type (WT) ADAR1, catalytically inactive mutant ADAR1 (E912A), or wild-type ADAR2. b-actin was used as a loading control. (C) Relative luciferase signals in 293T cells prepared as in (B). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (D) Live-cell fluorescent imaging of GFP expression in human myeloid leukemia TF-1a cells transduced with the ADAR1 nanoluc-GFP reporter vector (lower panels) compared with untransduced controls (upper panels). (E) Detection of nanoluciferase expression via in vivo bioluminescence (IVIS) imaging of no transplant control (far left), <t>K562-nanoluc-GFP</t> and pCDH vector transduced, and K562-nanoluc-GFP and ADAR1 wild-type or E912A mutant transduced human leukemia cells (K562) transplanted into Rag2/gc/ mice. (F) Luminescence-based quantification of ADAR1-dependent nanoluciferase signals in CD34+ cells from primary, high-risk MF samples (*untreated patient) after in vitro transduction with the ADAR1 nanoluc-GFP reporter and treatment with vehicle control (DMSO) or Rebecsinib (72 h). Relative luciferase signals were normalized to cell viability for each condition. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. p < 0.05 Rebecsinib compared with DMSO controls by pairwise t test. (G) Intracellular flow cytometry-based quantification of STAT3 phosphorylation (expressed as mean fluorescence intensity [MFI], values within HPC populations) after in vitro treatment with vehicle control (DMSO) or Rebecsinib (1 mM, 72 h). p < 0.05 Rebecsinib compared with DMSO controls by pairwise t test. See also Figure S1.
Human K562 Cells, supplied by ATCC, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 99/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/human k562 cells/product/ATCC
Average 99 stars, based on 1 article reviews
human k562 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
99/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Illumina Inc k5 62 ka su m i-1 bcr::abl1
Figure 2. Development of a lentiviral ADAR1 A-to-I RNA editing reporter (A) Schematic diagram demonstrating the synthetic RNA sequence containing an ADAR1-sensitive stop codon that, upon A-to-I editing, reads through to produce nanoluciferase and GFP proteins separated by a T2A cleavage site. (B) ADAR protein expression levels in 293T cells co-transfected with the ADAR1 nanoluciferase-GFP (nanoluc-GFP) reporter and increasing amounts of FLAG- tagged wild-type (WT) ADAR1, catalytically inactive mutant ADAR1 (E912A), or wild-type ADAR2. b-actin was used as a loading control. (C) Relative luciferase signals in 293T cells prepared as in (B). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (D) Live-cell fluorescent imaging of GFP expression in human myeloid leukemia TF-1a cells transduced with the ADAR1 nanoluc-GFP reporter vector (lower panels) compared with untransduced controls (upper panels). (E) Detection of nanoluciferase expression via in vivo bioluminescence (IVIS) imaging of no transplant control (far left), <t>K562-nanoluc-GFP</t> and pCDH vector transduced, and K562-nanoluc-GFP and ADAR1 wild-type or E912A mutant transduced human leukemia cells (K562) transplanted into Rag2/gc/ mice. (F) Luminescence-based quantification of ADAR1-dependent nanoluciferase signals in CD34+ cells from primary, high-risk MF samples (*untreated patient) after in vitro transduction with the ADAR1 nanoluc-GFP reporter and treatment with vehicle control (DMSO) or Rebecsinib (72 h). Relative luciferase signals were normalized to cell viability for each condition. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. p < 0.05 Rebecsinib compared with DMSO controls by pairwise t test. (G) Intracellular flow cytometry-based quantification of STAT3 phosphorylation (expressed as mean fluorescence intensity [MFI], values within HPC populations) after in vitro treatment with vehicle control (DMSO) or Rebecsinib (1 mM, 72 h). p < 0.05 Rebecsinib compared with DMSO controls by pairwise t test. See also Figure S1.
K5 62 Ka Su M I 1 Bcr/Abl1, supplied by Illumina Inc, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/k5 62 ka su m i-1 bcr::abl1/product/Illumina Inc
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
k5 62 ka su m i-1 bcr::abl1 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
AcceGen Biotechnology isogenic k562 cell line
Figure 2. Development of a lentiviral ADAR1 A-to-I RNA editing reporter (A) Schematic diagram demonstrating the synthetic RNA sequence containing an ADAR1-sensitive stop codon that, upon A-to-I editing, reads through to produce nanoluciferase and GFP proteins separated by a T2A cleavage site. (B) ADAR protein expression levels in 293T cells co-transfected with the ADAR1 nanoluciferase-GFP (nanoluc-GFP) reporter and increasing amounts of FLAG- tagged wild-type (WT) ADAR1, catalytically inactive mutant ADAR1 (E912A), or wild-type ADAR2. b-actin was used as a loading control. (C) Relative luciferase signals in 293T cells prepared as in (B). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (D) Live-cell fluorescent imaging of GFP expression in human myeloid leukemia TF-1a cells transduced with the ADAR1 nanoluc-GFP reporter vector (lower panels) compared with untransduced controls (upper panels). (E) Detection of nanoluciferase expression via in vivo bioluminescence (IVIS) imaging of no transplant control (far left), <t>K562-nanoluc-GFP</t> and pCDH vector transduced, and K562-nanoluc-GFP and ADAR1 wild-type or E912A mutant transduced human leukemia cells (K562) transplanted into Rag2/gc/ mice. (F) Luminescence-based quantification of ADAR1-dependent nanoluciferase signals in CD34+ cells from primary, high-risk MF samples (*untreated patient) after in vitro transduction with the ADAR1 nanoluc-GFP reporter and treatment with vehicle control (DMSO) or Rebecsinib (72 h). Relative luciferase signals were normalized to cell viability for each condition. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. p < 0.05 Rebecsinib compared with DMSO controls by pairwise t test. (G) Intracellular flow cytometry-based quantification of STAT3 phosphorylation (expressed as mean fluorescence intensity [MFI], values within HPC populations) after in vitro treatment with vehicle control (DMSO) or Rebecsinib (1 mM, 72 h). p < 0.05 Rebecsinib compared with DMSO controls by pairwise t test. See also Figure S1.
Isogenic K562 Cell Line, supplied by AcceGen Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/isogenic k562 cell line/product/AcceGen Biotechnology
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
isogenic k562 cell line - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Hamad Medical Corporation b. cenocepacia k56-2
Figure 2. Development of a lentiviral ADAR1 A-to-I RNA editing reporter (A) Schematic diagram demonstrating the synthetic RNA sequence containing an ADAR1-sensitive stop codon that, upon A-to-I editing, reads through to produce nanoluciferase and GFP proteins separated by a T2A cleavage site. (B) ADAR protein expression levels in 293T cells co-transfected with the ADAR1 nanoluciferase-GFP (nanoluc-GFP) reporter and increasing amounts of FLAG- tagged wild-type (WT) ADAR1, catalytically inactive mutant ADAR1 (E912A), or wild-type ADAR2. b-actin was used as a loading control. (C) Relative luciferase signals in 293T cells prepared as in (B). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (D) Live-cell fluorescent imaging of GFP expression in human myeloid leukemia TF-1a cells transduced with the ADAR1 nanoluc-GFP reporter vector (lower panels) compared with untransduced controls (upper panels). (E) Detection of nanoluciferase expression via in vivo bioluminescence (IVIS) imaging of no transplant control (far left), <t>K562-nanoluc-GFP</t> and pCDH vector transduced, and K562-nanoluc-GFP and ADAR1 wild-type or E912A mutant transduced human leukemia cells (K562) transplanted into Rag2/gc/ mice. (F) Luminescence-based quantification of ADAR1-dependent nanoluciferase signals in CD34+ cells from primary, high-risk MF samples (*untreated patient) after in vitro transduction with the ADAR1 nanoluc-GFP reporter and treatment with vehicle control (DMSO) or Rebecsinib (72 h). Relative luciferase signals were normalized to cell viability for each condition. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. p < 0.05 Rebecsinib compared with DMSO controls by pairwise t test. (G) Intracellular flow cytometry-based quantification of STAT3 phosphorylation (expressed as mean fluorescence intensity [MFI], values within HPC populations) after in vitro treatment with vehicle control (DMSO) or Rebecsinib (1 mM, 72 h). p < 0.05 Rebecsinib compared with DMSO controls by pairwise t test. See also Figure S1.
B. Cenocepacia K56 2, supplied by Hamad Medical Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/b. cenocepacia k56-2/product/Hamad Medical Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
b. cenocepacia k56-2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Hamad Medical Corporation gentamicin-sensitive derivatives of b. cenocepacia strains j2315 and k56-2
Figure 2. Development of a lentiviral ADAR1 A-to-I RNA editing reporter (A) Schematic diagram demonstrating the synthetic RNA sequence containing an ADAR1-sensitive stop codon that, upon A-to-I editing, reads through to produce nanoluciferase and GFP proteins separated by a T2A cleavage site. (B) ADAR protein expression levels in 293T cells co-transfected with the ADAR1 nanoluciferase-GFP (nanoluc-GFP) reporter and increasing amounts of FLAG- tagged wild-type (WT) ADAR1, catalytically inactive mutant ADAR1 (E912A), or wild-type ADAR2. b-actin was used as a loading control. (C) Relative luciferase signals in 293T cells prepared as in (B). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (D) Live-cell fluorescent imaging of GFP expression in human myeloid leukemia TF-1a cells transduced with the ADAR1 nanoluc-GFP reporter vector (lower panels) compared with untransduced controls (upper panels). (E) Detection of nanoluciferase expression via in vivo bioluminescence (IVIS) imaging of no transplant control (far left), <t>K562-nanoluc-GFP</t> and pCDH vector transduced, and K562-nanoluc-GFP and ADAR1 wild-type or E912A mutant transduced human leukemia cells (K562) transplanted into Rag2/gc/ mice. (F) Luminescence-based quantification of ADAR1-dependent nanoluciferase signals in CD34+ cells from primary, high-risk MF samples (*untreated patient) after in vitro transduction with the ADAR1 nanoluc-GFP reporter and treatment with vehicle control (DMSO) or Rebecsinib (72 h). Relative luciferase signals were normalized to cell viability for each condition. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. p < 0.05 Rebecsinib compared with DMSO controls by pairwise t test. (G) Intracellular flow cytometry-based quantification of STAT3 phosphorylation (expressed as mean fluorescence intensity [MFI], values within HPC populations) after in vitro treatment with vehicle control (DMSO) or Rebecsinib (1 mM, 72 h). p < 0.05 Rebecsinib compared with DMSO controls by pairwise t test. See also Figure S1.
Gentamicin Sensitive Derivatives Of B. Cenocepacia Strains J2315 And K56 2, supplied by Hamad Medical Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/gentamicin-sensitive derivatives of b. cenocepacia strains j2315 and k56-2/product/Hamad Medical Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
gentamicin-sensitive derivatives of b. cenocepacia strains j2315 and k56-2 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Verlag GmbH hl-60
Figure 2. Development of a lentiviral ADAR1 A-to-I RNA editing reporter (A) Schematic diagram demonstrating the synthetic RNA sequence containing an ADAR1-sensitive stop codon that, upon A-to-I editing, reads through to produce nanoluciferase and GFP proteins separated by a T2A cleavage site. (B) ADAR protein expression levels in 293T cells co-transfected with the ADAR1 nanoluciferase-GFP (nanoluc-GFP) reporter and increasing amounts of FLAG- tagged wild-type (WT) ADAR1, catalytically inactive mutant ADAR1 (E912A), or wild-type ADAR2. b-actin was used as a loading control. (C) Relative luciferase signals in 293T cells prepared as in (B). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (D) Live-cell fluorescent imaging of GFP expression in human myeloid leukemia TF-1a cells transduced with the ADAR1 nanoluc-GFP reporter vector (lower panels) compared with untransduced controls (upper panels). (E) Detection of nanoluciferase expression via in vivo bioluminescence (IVIS) imaging of no transplant control (far left), <t>K562-nanoluc-GFP</t> and pCDH vector transduced, and K562-nanoluc-GFP and ADAR1 wild-type or E912A mutant transduced human leukemia cells (K562) transplanted into Rag2/gc/ mice. (F) Luminescence-based quantification of ADAR1-dependent nanoluciferase signals in CD34+ cells from primary, high-risk MF samples (*untreated patient) after in vitro transduction with the ADAR1 nanoluc-GFP reporter and treatment with vehicle control (DMSO) or Rebecsinib (72 h). Relative luciferase signals were normalized to cell viability for each condition. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. p < 0.05 Rebecsinib compared with DMSO controls by pairwise t test. (G) Intracellular flow cytometry-based quantification of STAT3 phosphorylation (expressed as mean fluorescence intensity [MFI], values within HPC populations) after in vitro treatment with vehicle control (DMSO) or Rebecsinib (1 mM, 72 h). p < 0.05 Rebecsinib compared with DMSO controls by pairwise t test. See also Figure S1.
Hl 60, supplied by Verlag GmbH, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/hl-60/product/Verlag GmbH
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
hl-60 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
CEM Corporation k-562
Figure 2. Development of a lentiviral ADAR1 A-to-I RNA editing reporter (A) Schematic diagram demonstrating the synthetic RNA sequence containing an ADAR1-sensitive stop codon that, upon A-to-I editing, reads through to produce nanoluciferase and GFP proteins separated by a T2A cleavage site. (B) ADAR protein expression levels in 293T cells co-transfected with the ADAR1 nanoluciferase-GFP (nanoluc-GFP) reporter and increasing amounts of FLAG- tagged wild-type (WT) ADAR1, catalytically inactive mutant ADAR1 (E912A), or wild-type ADAR2. b-actin was used as a loading control. (C) Relative luciferase signals in 293T cells prepared as in (B). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (D) Live-cell fluorescent imaging of GFP expression in human myeloid leukemia TF-1a cells transduced with the ADAR1 nanoluc-GFP reporter vector (lower panels) compared with untransduced controls (upper panels). (E) Detection of nanoluciferase expression via in vivo bioluminescence (IVIS) imaging of no transplant control (far left), <t>K562-nanoluc-GFP</t> and pCDH vector transduced, and K562-nanoluc-GFP and ADAR1 wild-type or E912A mutant transduced human leukemia cells (K562) transplanted into Rag2/gc/ mice. (F) Luminescence-based quantification of ADAR1-dependent nanoluciferase signals in CD34+ cells from primary, high-risk MF samples (*untreated patient) after in vitro transduction with the ADAR1 nanoluc-GFP reporter and treatment with vehicle control (DMSO) or Rebecsinib (72 h). Relative luciferase signals were normalized to cell viability for each condition. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. p < 0.05 Rebecsinib compared with DMSO controls by pairwise t test. (G) Intracellular flow cytometry-based quantification of STAT3 phosphorylation (expressed as mean fluorescence intensity [MFI], values within HPC populations) after in vitro treatment with vehicle control (DMSO) or Rebecsinib (1 mM, 72 h). p < 0.05 Rebecsinib compared with DMSO controls by pairwise t test. See also Figure S1.
K 562, supplied by CEM Corporation, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/k-562/product/CEM Corporation
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
k-562 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

k-562  (DSMZ)
90
DSMZ k-562
Figure 2. Development of a lentiviral ADAR1 A-to-I RNA editing reporter (A) Schematic diagram demonstrating the synthetic RNA sequence containing an ADAR1-sensitive stop codon that, upon A-to-I editing, reads through to produce nanoluciferase and GFP proteins separated by a T2A cleavage site. (B) ADAR protein expression levels in 293T cells co-transfected with the ADAR1 nanoluciferase-GFP (nanoluc-GFP) reporter and increasing amounts of FLAG- tagged wild-type (WT) ADAR1, catalytically inactive mutant ADAR1 (E912A), or wild-type ADAR2. b-actin was used as a loading control. (C) Relative luciferase signals in 293T cells prepared as in (B). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (D) Live-cell fluorescent imaging of GFP expression in human myeloid leukemia TF-1a cells transduced with the ADAR1 nanoluc-GFP reporter vector (lower panels) compared with untransduced controls (upper panels). (E) Detection of nanoluciferase expression via in vivo bioluminescence (IVIS) imaging of no transplant control (far left), <t>K562-nanoluc-GFP</t> and pCDH vector transduced, and K562-nanoluc-GFP and ADAR1 wild-type or E912A mutant transduced human leukemia cells (K562) transplanted into Rag2/gc/ mice. (F) Luminescence-based quantification of ADAR1-dependent nanoluciferase signals in CD34+ cells from primary, high-risk MF samples (*untreated patient) after in vitro transduction with the ADAR1 nanoluc-GFP reporter and treatment with vehicle control (DMSO) or Rebecsinib (72 h). Relative luciferase signals were normalized to cell viability for each condition. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. p < 0.05 Rebecsinib compared with DMSO controls by pairwise t test. (G) Intracellular flow cytometry-based quantification of STAT3 phosphorylation (expressed as mean fluorescence intensity [MFI], values within HPC populations) after in vitro treatment with vehicle control (DMSO) or Rebecsinib (1 mM, 72 h). p < 0.05 Rebecsinib compared with DMSO controls by pairwise t test. See also Figure S1.
K 562, supplied by DSMZ, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/k-562/product/DSMZ
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
k-562 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
Dainihon Jochugiku Co thp-1 cells
Figure 2. Development of a lentiviral ADAR1 A-to-I RNA editing reporter (A) Schematic diagram demonstrating the synthetic RNA sequence containing an ADAR1-sensitive stop codon that, upon A-to-I editing, reads through to produce nanoluciferase and GFP proteins separated by a T2A cleavage site. (B) ADAR protein expression levels in 293T cells co-transfected with the ADAR1 nanoluciferase-GFP (nanoluc-GFP) reporter and increasing amounts of FLAG- tagged wild-type (WT) ADAR1, catalytically inactive mutant ADAR1 (E912A), or wild-type ADAR2. b-actin was used as a loading control. (C) Relative luciferase signals in 293T cells prepared as in (B). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (D) Live-cell fluorescent imaging of GFP expression in human myeloid leukemia TF-1a cells transduced with the ADAR1 nanoluc-GFP reporter vector (lower panels) compared with untransduced controls (upper panels). (E) Detection of nanoluciferase expression via in vivo bioluminescence (IVIS) imaging of no transplant control (far left), <t>K562-nanoluc-GFP</t> and pCDH vector transduced, and K562-nanoluc-GFP and ADAR1 wild-type or E912A mutant transduced human leukemia cells (K562) transplanted into Rag2/gc/ mice. (F) Luminescence-based quantification of ADAR1-dependent nanoluciferase signals in CD34+ cells from primary, high-risk MF samples (*untreated patient) after in vitro transduction with the ADAR1 nanoluc-GFP reporter and treatment with vehicle control (DMSO) or Rebecsinib (72 h). Relative luciferase signals were normalized to cell viability for each condition. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. p < 0.05 Rebecsinib compared with DMSO controls by pairwise t test. (G) Intracellular flow cytometry-based quantification of STAT3 phosphorylation (expressed as mean fluorescence intensity [MFI], values within HPC populations) after in vitro treatment with vehicle control (DMSO) or Rebecsinib (1 mM, 72 h). p < 0.05 Rebecsinib compared with DMSO controls by pairwise t test. See also Figure S1.
Thp 1 Cells, supplied by Dainihon Jochugiku Co, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/thp-1 cells/product/Dainihon Jochugiku Co
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
thp-1 cells - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


Figure 2. Development of a lentiviral ADAR1 A-to-I RNA editing reporter (A) Schematic diagram demonstrating the synthetic RNA sequence containing an ADAR1-sensitive stop codon that, upon A-to-I editing, reads through to produce nanoluciferase and GFP proteins separated by a T2A cleavage site. (B) ADAR protein expression levels in 293T cells co-transfected with the ADAR1 nanoluciferase-GFP (nanoluc-GFP) reporter and increasing amounts of FLAG- tagged wild-type (WT) ADAR1, catalytically inactive mutant ADAR1 (E912A), or wild-type ADAR2. b-actin was used as a loading control. (C) Relative luciferase signals in 293T cells prepared as in (B). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (D) Live-cell fluorescent imaging of GFP expression in human myeloid leukemia TF-1a cells transduced with the ADAR1 nanoluc-GFP reporter vector (lower panels) compared with untransduced controls (upper panels). (E) Detection of nanoluciferase expression via in vivo bioluminescence (IVIS) imaging of no transplant control (far left), K562-nanoluc-GFP and pCDH vector transduced, and K562-nanoluc-GFP and ADAR1 wild-type or E912A mutant transduced human leukemia cells (K562) transplanted into Rag2/gc/ mice. (F) Luminescence-based quantification of ADAR1-dependent nanoluciferase signals in CD34+ cells from primary, high-risk MF samples (*untreated patient) after in vitro transduction with the ADAR1 nanoluc-GFP reporter and treatment with vehicle control (DMSO) or Rebecsinib (72 h). Relative luciferase signals were normalized to cell viability for each condition. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. p < 0.05 Rebecsinib compared with DMSO controls by pairwise t test. (G) Intracellular flow cytometry-based quantification of STAT3 phosphorylation (expressed as mean fluorescence intensity [MFI], values within HPC populations) after in vitro treatment with vehicle control (DMSO) or Rebecsinib (1 mM, 72 h). p < 0.05 Rebecsinib compared with DMSO controls by pairwise t test. See also Figure S1.

Journal: Cell stem cell

Article Title: Reversal of malignant ADAR1 splice isoform switching with Rebecsinib.

doi: 10.1016/j.stem.2023.01.008

Figure Lengend Snippet: Figure 2. Development of a lentiviral ADAR1 A-to-I RNA editing reporter (A) Schematic diagram demonstrating the synthetic RNA sequence containing an ADAR1-sensitive stop codon that, upon A-to-I editing, reads through to produce nanoluciferase and GFP proteins separated by a T2A cleavage site. (B) ADAR protein expression levels in 293T cells co-transfected with the ADAR1 nanoluciferase-GFP (nanoluc-GFP) reporter and increasing amounts of FLAG- tagged wild-type (WT) ADAR1, catalytically inactive mutant ADAR1 (E912A), or wild-type ADAR2. b-actin was used as a loading control. (C) Relative luciferase signals in 293T cells prepared as in (B). Data are represented as mean ± SEM. (D) Live-cell fluorescent imaging of GFP expression in human myeloid leukemia TF-1a cells transduced with the ADAR1 nanoluc-GFP reporter vector (lower panels) compared with untransduced controls (upper panels). (E) Detection of nanoluciferase expression via in vivo bioluminescence (IVIS) imaging of no transplant control (far left), K562-nanoluc-GFP and pCDH vector transduced, and K562-nanoluc-GFP and ADAR1 wild-type or E912A mutant transduced human leukemia cells (K562) transplanted into Rag2/gc/ mice. (F) Luminescence-based quantification of ADAR1-dependent nanoluciferase signals in CD34+ cells from primary, high-risk MF samples (*untreated patient) after in vitro transduction with the ADAR1 nanoluc-GFP reporter and treatment with vehicle control (DMSO) or Rebecsinib (72 h). Relative luciferase signals were normalized to cell viability for each condition. Data are represented as mean ± SEM. p < 0.05 Rebecsinib compared with DMSO controls by pairwise t test. (G) Intracellular flow cytometry-based quantification of STAT3 phosphorylation (expressed as mean fluorescence intensity [MFI], values within HPC populations) after in vitro treatment with vehicle control (DMSO) or Rebecsinib (1 mM, 72 h). p < 0.05 Rebecsinib compared with DMSO controls by pairwise t test. See also Figure S1.

Article Snippet: In vitro culture of cell lines The following cell lines were used for in vitro lentiviral reporter assays and biomarker development: human KG-1a cells (AML cells derived from a 59 y/omale, cultured in Iscove’sModified Dulbecco’sMedium, Catalog No. 30-2005, 20% fetal bovine serum), human K562 cells (blast crisis chronic myeloid leukemia cells isolated from a 53 y/o female, cultured in Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium, Catalog No. 30-2005, 10% fetal bovine serum), human TF-1a cells (erythroleukemia cells isolated from a 35 y/o male, cultured in RPMI-1640 Medium, ATCC 30-2001, 10% fetal bovine serum), humanMOLM-13 (sAML cells isolated from a 20 y/o male, cultured in RPMI-1640 Medium, ATCC 30-2001, 10% fetal bovine serum), human HL-60 cells (acute promyelocytic leukemia cells isolated from a 36 y/o female, cultured in Iscove’s Modified Dulbecco’s Medium, Catalog No. 30-2005, 20% fetal bovine serum), 293T cells (human kidney epithelial cells from human fetus, cultured in Dulbecco’s Modified Eagle’sMedium (DMEM) (ATCC 30-2002, 10% fetal bovine serum), and rat RBL-1 cells (leukemia cells isolated from the Wistar strain, cultured in Eagle’s Minimum Essential Medium, Catalog No. 30-2003, 10% fetal bovine serum).

Techniques: Sequencing, Expressing, Transfection, Mutagenesis, Control, Luciferase, Imaging, Transduction, Plasmid Preparation, In Vivo, In Vitro, Cytometry, Phospho-proteomics